Monday, 9 December 2013

The Gaze

Narcissistic identification
The audience identifies with the character in the image, making them
want to be like the character by buying the product




Scopophilia
The pleasure in looking. Makes use of desire,
quite often through the objectification of the subject.
















Voyeurism
looking into somebodys life, this draws the viewer in through the interest in what other do, the joy of observing
















Disruptions
Ambient ads, people don't expect to see it and therefore are attracted to the abnormal.













Intradiegetic
This Gaze draws the viewer to look at a focal point by following the gaze of characters within the image.













Sutra 
When the gaze is looking at you, engaging you as the audience.

Panopticism



1) what is the major effect of Panopticism

The effect that the Panopticon has, is to produce a state of self regulated conscience through the automatic functioning of power due to understanding that one may be permanantly under inspection.

2) How does the architecture (institution) create and sustain a power relation independent of the person who exercises it?

The architecture of the institution sustains a relationship of power  because the inmate in the institution knows himself to be observed, even though he is unaware of when s/he is being observed. This means that the position of power is not simply applied to one person, it is applied to any observer, or operator of the system, the relationship of power is purely based on the prisoners knowledge that s/he is being observed without ever seeing the observer.

3) In what way is the panopticon efficient?

The panopticon is efficient because there is no need for the use of force, no need for the use of restraints, the system  works through the application of responsibility for their actions upon the inmates. The inmate is their own regulator because of subjection applied through a fictitious relation with the observer.

4) How does the Panopticism do the work of a naturalist (scientist)?

Because the inmates are unaware of when they are observed, the system leads to findings that are more accurate to reality when studying the inmates behaviours. The inmates are not influenced by interaction with others, and because they do not know when they are being watched they cannot subconsciously or consciously react to observation in an unnatural way, therefore the results are much more true.

5) In what way was the Panopticon a laboratory?

"But the Panopticon was also a laboratory; it could be used as a machine to carry out experiments, to alter behaviour, to train or correct individuals" This is true for similar reasons as that of the above question. Because the panopticon is a controlled environment its studies show the inmates in a separated and therefore uninfluenced state. There is also the advantage that the observer can be observed at any point by an exterior observer, so the work of the person in control of the machinery is also forced to exact there work correctly.

6) List the conditions in which Panopticism strengthens power.

The system of Panopticism strengthens power because...

The number of persons required to exercise power is reduced, more inmates can be controlled by a single guard than in a regular prison.

It is possible to see any offence occurring, from the central observation post and therefore in the case of an incident intervention can be exacted quickly.

Because the inmate is aware of the above point, the pressure to behave in the intended way is likely to remove the need for the exacting of power.

The panopticon uses the power of the mind to control actions, there is no need for power to be exacted at all as long as the idea is given to the inmate that they are being watched and that power may be exacted at a time of misbehaviour. The power situation is created within the mind of the inmate.

7) According to Julius, how is the panoptic principle particularly useful in a society made of private individuals and the state?

'In a society in which the principal elements are no longer the community and public life, but , on the one hand, private individuals and, on the other, the state, relations can be regulated only in a form that is the exact reverse of the spectacle: 'It was to the modern age, to the ever-growing influence of the state, to its ever more profound intervention in all the details and all the relations of  social life, that was reserved the task of increasing and perfecting its guarantees, by using and directing towards the great aim the building and distribution of buildings intended to observe a great multitude of men at the same time.' p69 - The state would be able to observe the masses without need for large scale of employes personally exacting their power, simply through observation posts.

8) Also according to Julius, rather than suppress the individual, what effect does the Panoptic principle have?

By becoming part of the panoptic mechanism the individual is moulded by the psychological pressure of power, into patterns of behaviour or rehabilitation that suit the state, rather than being forced, their behaviours are induced through self control.

The Rhetorics of Creativity

The are nine Rhetorics of creativity.


"The rhetorics of creativity are given names which broadly correspond to the main theoretical underpinnings or the ideological beliefs of those who deploy them." Banaji, Shakuntala (2008)


Creative Genius
Democratic & political creativity challenge
Ubiquitous creativity
Creativity for social good
Creativity as economic imperative
Play & Creativity
Creativity & cognition
The creative affordance of technology
The creative classroom


As I have touched on this campaign briefly before, I thought it would be interesting to look at the Rhetoric which stands behind the...



The VW Fun theory
This campaign is a good example how creativity can be used for social good, and in the case of the fun theory it ties VW as a brand to a principal of improving human behaviour, experience and conscience in a way that will better themselves, their loved ones and the community.

Speed camera lottery - "The winning idea of the fun theory award, submitted by Kevin Richardson, USA. Can we get more people to obey the speed limit by making it fun to do? This was the question Kevin’s idea answered and it was so good that Volkswagen, together with The Swedish National Society for Road Safety, actually made this innovative idea a reality in Stockholm, Sweden."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iynzHWwJXaA
Fun belt - "Can we ensure everyone keeps their safety belt on by making it fun to do? This is another of the ideas that made it to the final of the fun theory award, created by Nevena Stojanovic from Serbia. The idea is being tested in Sweden in the hope it could be applied to all vehicles in the future."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0AbQSE4ZKvk#t=31
Bottle bank arcade - Many of us return our plastic bottles and cans. Noticeably fewer recycle their glass. Maybe that's because we don't get any money in return, as we do for cans and plastic. Can we change this attitude by making recycling glass fun to do? So you are not just rewarded with a good conscience, you also get a smile. See the results here.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zSiHjMU-MUo
Piano stairs - "”Take the stairs instead of the escalator or elevator and feel better” is something we often hear or read in the Sunday papers. Few people actually follow that advice. Can we get more people to take the stairs over the escalator by making it fun to do? See the results here"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lXh2n0aPyw
Worlds deepest bin - "To throw rubbish in the bin instead of onto the floor shouldn’t really be so hard. Many people still fail to do so. Can we get more people to throw rubbish into the bin, rather than onto the ground, by making it fun to do? See the results here."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cbEKAwCoCKw


The idea behind the fun theory is that people will be more willing to change their behaviour if it is fun to do. Volkswagen use the theory to promote the use of their environmental cars. This campaign is a great example of a way in which advertising as an industry can improve its relationship with the public, along with improving the impact that its work has on the world, environment and obviously the people it reaches out to. Their is an underlying message of responsiblity that is attached to the brand in a way that doesn't simply scream "look at us making economic cars", It simply says "look at how we can make a difference."





Bibliography

Banaji, Shakuntala (2008) Creativity: exploring the rhetorics and the realities (available  at http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/27362/1/Creativity_exploring_the_rhetorics_and_the_realities_(lsero).pdf)

Thursday, 5 December 2013

Simulacra, the problem of meaning and reality

Plato's cave brief summary.

Plato uses a simile of the projections within the cave to describe the reality that the public see. this is however not actually a reality, it is a simulacrum.

The movement through the writing describes how as each simulation is toppled by the discovery of what creates it, a new reality is born in the mind, because of a new, higher understanding of what reality is.

Plato believed there was a higher reality even than the one in which he was living, beyond what he called the world of appearances.




Visual Culture a brief summary.

This text discusses the flattening of meaning. It discusses the line between reality and simulacrum being crossed completely within art and media.

The point is made that this simulacrum has been produced through the forcing of meaning, within the media, to a point at which the reality portrayed is not actually a reality.

The viewers own sense of reality is changed to a hyper-reality produced by images being repeated without meaning, disconnecting from relevance to the audience, in a cycle that simply pushes itself further from any form of reality.





Jean Baudrillard : Simulacra and Simulation. Brief summary of text.

"To dissimulate is to pretend not to have what one has. To simulate is to feign to have what one doesn't have." Baudrillard discusses in the first section of the text, the divine irreference of images, how simulation is much more complicated than this initial discription. He uses the example of the simulation of illness. On one hand you have the person who fakes an illness by simply telling people they are ill, this leaving the "principal of reality intact." The dissimulator knows the difference themself, they are simply masking the truth. However where reality is put to trial, is with the simulator. If someone simulates an illness, they have produced the symptoms of the illness in themselves. Baudrillard states it is in this scenario that the "difference between the true and the false, the real and the imaginary" is threatened. Here the question of wether the simulator is ill or not is difficult to answer because in reality they produce the same symptoms as if they were actually afflicted with said illness. This scenario is translated to the loss of meaning through reference to medicine. If any symptom can be produced, then any illness could simply be simulated and medicine, which treats the "physical cause" for said illness, becomes meaningless because the line between what is really causing the illness, psychosomatic or physical, is blurred and you cannot treat a cause that is not there.

Baudrillard moves on to discuss the idea of simulacra in religion. Having looked at the iconoclasts destruction of worshiping idols, as they dissimulate god through representing what is supposedly represented in the conscience and cannot be seen. He questions whether god himself can be indeed just simulated, through being reduced to the signs that constitute faith. A good example for this is the apparition of God. Because the idea is given to those who hold faith in god, that he may appear to a person, or have a divine affect on said person, this supposedly being suggested as a sign of the reality of that faith, through the possibly dissimulated messages preached, from which origin of that religion stems, by the same idea of the simulacrum, any apparition or divine happening could have been simulated by the subconscious of the believer, that is to say that the subconscious may be simulating the sign from outside the physical control of the person, and this then questions whether God can be real or just a mass combination of dissimulation and the following simulation that has resulted in the simulacrum that is the belief in God.

In regards to the media, Baudrillard's hypothesis, within the implosion of meaning in the media, says that because of the way in which information is so heavily subscribed to in modernity, through so many different channels, there is a distinct loss of meaning because of the hyper acceleration of when, where and how it is received.
"Whoever is under-exposed to the media is desocialized or virtually asocial. Everywhere information is thought to produce an accelerated circulation of meaning" however instead the channels by which people receive this information are simply over saturated leaving no room for specific meaning, just a blanketed environment of mass information devouring its own content.

In Advertising ground zero, the idea of advertising having moved out of simple publicity, of a consumable product, is suggested. A comparison is drawn to the social. Where in advertising is said to have lost any form to a point where it does not have its own substance, through its consumer, but simply through the simulation of the modern social mechanism. Advertising is simulacra, much as the public domain is, meanings that have been dissimulated and simulated time and time over to the point where they drive themselves to more production of signs and meanings and the difference between what is real (information) and what is social simulation has been lost.